MOTION TO CHILL
COMES NOW the Mover, a Snæfellsjökuls rawlings, and respectfully requests the Deliberative Assembly to chill. This Motion is submitted to the Deliberative Assembly in accordance with an ecocentric framework, which situates societal, educational, economic, legal, relational, and cultural drivers as interdependent with ecosystems and more-than-human entities.
In support of this Motion, the Mover states the following.
Reason for Chill
How we perceive our glacial relations may inform human survivorship on a transforming planet. To wit: modern-day humans and their ancestors have only ever lived within icehouse Earth environs. As inhabitants who evolved within the Quaternary ice age with its alternations of glacial and interglacial periods, human habitability and survivorship on the planet has been intrinsically linked with the presence of ice sheets, ice caps, glaciers, and permafrost. With the tipping of seven of nine planetary boundaries, Earth’s icehouse veers towards a premature entry into a greenhouse period—untested for human species as a climate much hotter than any human has ever lived within. When humans recast ourselves as glacial beings, what can we learn with glaciers as our mentors?
The interdependence inherent within the term glacial beings is intended to invite exploration of a glacial withness, through which humans practice að jökla (to become-with glacier). This may include an encouragement (even a responsibility,) for humans to attune to geosemiotics by learning glacial communication. And so, how to approach gleaning a glacial vocabulary?
Glaciers lead by action. They instruct through showing-doing. Glaciers offer their lessons through embodied and relational experiential knowledge transference. Humans access glacial communication through temporal and sensorial attunements. Likewise, humans communicate with glaciers through sensorial and temporal materials. Learning and practicing a glacial vocabulary may provide avenues for ecosystem engagement and more-than-human communion or consultation.
The Mover affirms that the requested glacial relations are not intended for fraudulent purposes and serve a legitimate interest. We acknowledge ourselves as glacial beings who practice glacial withness at a time when seven of nine planetary boundaries have been breached.
To subvert status-quo institutional hegemony and speciesism, we propose glacial communication be formally adopted as official languages in locations where glaciers still exist. Learning glacial communication may begin with the mouth. Through inflows and outflows, we interconnect our water bodies. Through the pronunciation of human-language signifiers (მყინვარი, mto wa barafu, buzul, 冰川, ਗਲੇਸ਼ੀਅਰ, ghiacciaio, glaciar, glaciär, glacier, gletscher, глечер, हिमनद, hatun chullunku, isbreen, 氷河, jökull, ཁ་ ད, kōpaka, ledenik, یخچال طبیعی, ледник, мөңгү, мөсөн гол, пирях, گلیشیر, sermeq, ᐊᐅᔪᐃᑦᑐᖅ), we voice an encodement of centuries-long human-glacier relations. Repetition strengthens our familiarity but also estranges us from each word’s semantic halo. As we inhabit the collection of phonemes and morphemes, exploring their choreographies within our bodies, we recall our own experiences with glaciers and conjure ecological knowledges through each utterance and iteration.
This Motion furthermore asserts that steps should be taken to implement more-than-human deliberative assemblies where more-than-human entities are not represented by humans who speak on their behalf, but rather where more-than-human entities are afforded their own political voices through their situated signals. Such an assembly, heretofore referred to as a Þing, should occur outside of the Room, or at least with all windows of the Room thrown open. For glacial beings, a Jöklaþing would be a suitable name for a deliberative assembly on any matters impacting humans and more-than-humans.
Sociolegal Considerations
Exhibits
There are two exhibits which feature proposed glacial vocabulary and relational prompts. The exhibits offer strategies to cultivate a sense of glacial relation and glacial withness. These are the stepping stones to learn any glacial language (ie. jöklenska). The exhibits offer creative processes as repeatable models with the power to alter a person’s notion of themself as a place-maker and of their interconnectedness with ecosystems in flux.
Exhibit Jökloreography is a deck of fifty flash cards featuring verbs that describe glacial movement. Any human who practices these movements may be exploring a subset of glacial vocabulary.
Exhibit Glacial Relations offers twenty-four performance scores designed to attune humans to their temporal and sensorial interdependence with glaciers.
Exhibit: Jökloreography




Exhibit: Glacial Relations
WHEREFORE, the Mover respectfully requests that this Deliberative Assembly grant the Motion to Chill. By passing this Motion, the Assembly will disseminate the knowledge that humans are glacial beings. Past, present, and future Jöklaþing members may form exploratory committees to consider formulation and implementation of Jöklaþing as well as ratifying jöklenska and other glacial languages as worthy of urgent protection and study.
Respectfully submitted,
DR. a Snæfellsjökuls rawlings
Mover
Action Requested
1 As the Mover loves in Iceland and has long-running interrelations with the glaciers, there is a reliance on Icelandic language and cultural heritage throughout this Motion. This in no way is intended to act as an endorsement for the concept or practice of a nation-state. That said, the Mover also co-founded the campaign Snæfellsjökul fyrir forseta (Snæfellsjökull for president), which nominated the glacier for the Icelandic presidency (Magnússon 2024; Kassam 2024; Meijer 2024; Balaguer 2024; Süddeutsche Zeitung 2024). So the Mover also acknowledges their active role in contributing to nation-state structures and rituals.
References
Balaguer, Carmina. 2024. ‘El glaciar de Islandia que quiso ser presidente del país’. Viajes National Geographic, July 4.
Bosson, J. B., M. Huss, S. Cauvy-Fraunié, et al. 2023. ‘Future Emergence of New Ecosystems Caused by Glacial Retreat’. Nature 620 (7974): 562–69.
Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
International Council on Human Rights Policy, Ichrp. 1999. ‘Taking Duties Seriously: Individual Duties in International Human Rights Law’. SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 1551228. Social Science Research Network.
International Year of Glaciers’ Preservation. 2025. ‘Vanishing Glaciers’.
Kassam, Ashifa. 2024. ‘Bid to Secure Spot for Glacier in Icelandic Presidential Race Heats Up’. World News. The Guardian, April 19.
Magnússon, Pétur. 2024. ‘Safna undirskriftum fyrir forsetaframboð Snæfellsjökuls’. RÚV, April 10.
Meijer, Eva. 2024. ‘Laten we stemmen voor een gletsjer’. NRC, June 18.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2004. ‘Beyond the Social Contract: Capabilities and Global Justice. An Olaf Palme Lecture, Delivered in Oxford on 19 June 2003’. Oxford Development Studies, ahead of print, March 1. World.
rawlings, a, Chris Turnbull, and Heather Hermant. 2014. o w n. CUE Books.
Rawlings, Angela. 2014. ‘Að Jökla: Ecolinguistic Activism through Acoustic Ecology, Countermapping, Travel Wreading, and Conversations with Landscapes’.
Rawlings, Angela. 2024. ‘To Listen Is to Relate Is to Sustain’. Þræðir 9 (May).
Rounce, David R., Regine Hock, Fabien Maussion, et al. 2023. ‘Global Glacier Change in the 21st Century: Every Increase in Temperature Matters’. Science, ahead of print, January 6. World.
Sakschewski, Boris, Caesar Levke, and Johan Rockström. 2025. Planetary Health Check 2025: A Scientific Assessment of the State of the Planet. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
Schechner, Richard. 2013. Performance Studies: An Introduction. 3rd edn. Routledge.
Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2024. ‘Das Streiflicht’. March 19.
Vanilla Ice. 1990. Ice Ice Baby. To the Extreme. EMI Records, September 10.
Weston, Phoebe. 2023. ‘Half of Glaciers Will Be Gone by 2100 Even under Paris 1.5C Accord, Study Finds’. Environment. The Guardian, January 5.
Zekollari, Harry, Matthias Huss, Lilian Schuster, et al. 2024. ‘Twenty-First Century Global Glacier Evolution under CMIP6 Scenarios and the Role of Glacier-Specific Observations’. The Cryosphere 18 (11): 5045–66.























